By Bixyl Shuftan
A the Tuesday "Meet the Lindens," I showed up and listened as Ebeb Linden, the CEO of Linden Lab,was interviewed by Jo Yardley. The event being held in voice, I took down notes on paper the best I could, and after logging off I wrote about the event. The notes I had taken suggested Ebbe had been leaning toward having residents use their real-life identities in Sansar.
This caused me to scratch my head, but from my point of view this wouldn't be the first time the Lab had made a questionable move. So I went ahead and wrote the story, confident I hadn't missed anything important. Later in the week I saw some
transcripts on Inara Pey's newsletter, and it seems I had only written down part of the information (
link).
Second Life is on, I would say, the far spectrum of the anonymity side;
and on the other side you have what we call real names, real identities,
like probably the most successful real system on planet Earth is
Facebook.
And there’s a reason why they’ve been extremely successful with that;
and there’s probably a reason why 100% anonymous networks like Twitter
and Second Life run into some really interesting challenges. And there
are pros and cons; and we’re trying to think of ways of potentially
mixing these models, but we have not made final decisions yet.
I have a preference, some other team players have slightly different
preferences, so we’ll see where it ends up. But I think what would be
best for Sansar would be real names, and then the ability to have
personas underneath that.
so I could go into a role-playing, or into an experience as an
anonymous user in that context. But to the platform, I am not anonymous.
And so, without making that too complicated and confusing, is that the
right answer? We’ll see. But I think to, it would certainly help with
griefing and other things. And it also supports a lot of interesting
use-cases where anonymity is actually just really confusing, and
actually gets in the way.
You can think of a lot of professional use-cases where there are
teachers and students and professionals having meetings where these
anonymous identities makes things really confusing; “I know Bob, I want
to talk to Bob. Who the hell is this Jumping Jack guy?”
So we’re still debating this, and I’m pushing in one way, and people
are pushing in different ways, and we’ll see where we end up. I mean,
unfortunately, to implement real names is also really complicated. Do
you hitch a ride with Facebook, or do you have to somehow build your own
real name system.
And building a real name system is incredibly difficult. Facebook did
it in an extremely clever way, by basically relying on the social graph
to ensure real names. Because just having everybody having to put a
credit card down, or identification to prove their real identity is
super cumbersome. So, interesting topic.
Taking a look at the transcript, there's room for interpretation. But it seems while pondering briefly how certain parts sounded, he was asked about the question of anonymity, being identifiable to the Lab through Paypal, though anonymous to everyone else.
If we have to reply on like, for some it’s PayPal, for some it’s
this, for some it’s that, it gets really complicated for us to do that.
It’s definitely something we’re thinking a lot about. but do I want
that people in Sansar should be able to walk around anonymously?
Absolutely! You can in the physical world. I don’t have to have a name
tag on myself and show my ID to every person I approach on the street.
not that I’m trying to hide anything, but I also don’t think everybody
should know what the hell I’m doing all the time. It’s none of your
business; it’s my business.
So I totally want to have that mix of, we know who you are but you
can also be whoever you want to be, and still have a somewhat functional
society going on within that. So we’ll see where we end up.
So it seems by brief inattention caused me to miss an important line.
I apologize for the error, to you the readers and to Ebbe Linden, and resolve to be more careful in the future.
Bixyl Shuftan